Start 14-Day Trial Subscription

*No credit card required

Editorial Dept.'s picture

Beer Review (Issue 23)

 


Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:


Exceptional (95 to 91)



95

by John C. Tull
Atrial Rubicite
Jester King Brewery

View Beer
Read Review



95

by Rodney A. Tillinghast
Black Ops
Brooklyn Brewery

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



95

by Jim Koebel
Alter Ego
Smartmouth Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



95

by Michael Bury
Death By Coconut
Oskar Blues Brewery

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



95

by Randy Scorby
Grapefruit Shandy
SanTan Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



95

by Michael McGuire
Poivre Potion
Terrapin Beer Co.

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



95

by Jason Johnson
Double Vision Doppelbock
Grand Teton Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review

Brewer Q & A



95

by Graham L. Barron
30th Anniversary Ale
Bell's Brewery

View Beer
Read Review


Pages

Table of Contents